Trump’s Executive Order Works to Undo Biden’s Gun Control Efforts

Gun on U.S. Constitution and flag.

President Trump issues executive order to safeguard Second Amendment rights, challenging Biden’s gun control policies.

Key Takeaways

  • Trump’s executive order “Protecting Second Amendment Rights” aims to review and potentially undo federal gun regulations.
  • Attorney General Pam Bondi is tasked with examining agency rules, especially those from the Biden Administration, within 30 days.
  • The order focuses on reversing Biden-era policies, including ATF rules on unfinished firearm parts and pistol-braced guns.
  • Gun-rights groups applaud the move, while gun-control advocates criticize it as contradictory to previous commitments.
  • The order emphasizes the Second Amendment as a safeguard of security and liberty, reflecting ongoing debates on gun rights versus regulation.

Trump’s Executive Action on Gun Rights

President Donald Trump has taken a significant step in the ongoing debate over gun rights and regulation by issuing an executive order titled “Protecting Second Amendment Rights.” This order directs a comprehensive review of federal regulations that may infringe upon the Second Amendment, with a particular focus on policies implemented during the Biden administration.

The executive order tasks Attorney General Pam Bondi with examining agency rules and policies, especially those from the Department of Justice and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), for any improper restrictions on gun rights. Bondi has been given a 30-day deadline to complete this review and propose a plan of action to protect Second Amendment rights.

Scope of the Review

The order directs a thorough examination of actions taken from January 2021 to January 2025, encompassing the entirety of President Biden’s term. This includes scrutiny of ATF rules on unfinished firearm parts and pistol-braced guns, as well as the agency’s “zero tolerance” policy for regulating licensed gun dealers. The review will also cover reports from the White House Office of Gun Violence Prevention and the government’s stance in gun-rights litigation.

“Gun owners fought hard to elect a president who would take a sledgehammer to Biden’s unconstitutional gun control policies, and today, President Trump proved he’s serious about that fight,” said Aidan Johnston, Gun Owners of America’s Director of Federal Affairs.

Additionally, the Attorney General is instructed to assess international agreements and litigation that may affect Second Amendment rights. The order emphasizes the importance of the Second Amendment as a fundamental safeguard of security and liberty for American citizens.

Reactions and Implications

The executive order has garnered strong reactions from both sides of the gun debate. Gun-rights groups have responded positively, viewing it as a fulfillment of Trump’s promises to gun owners. The National Rifle Association (NRA) expressed satisfaction with the order, seeing it as a commitment to protecting constitutional rights.

“Promises made to law-abiding gun owners are being kept by President Donald J. Trump,” said Doug Hamlin, NRA Executive Vice President.

However, gun-control groups have criticized the order, suggesting it contradicts Trump’s previous commitments to reduce gun trafficking. Some have pointed out the potential inconsistency between this action and recent promises made to the President of Mexico regarding efforts to curb the flow of guns across the border.

Looking Ahead

As the review process unfolds, the implications of this executive order on existing gun regulations and ongoing legal challenges remain to be seen. The Supreme Court is currently considering the legality of some of the rules targeted by this order, adding another layer of complexity to the situation.

As the 30-day review period progresses, all eyes will be on Attorney General Bondi and the Domestic Policy Advisor Steven Miller as they work to finalize and implement the plan to protect Second Amendment rights. The outcome of this review could potentially reshape the landscape of federal gun policy and reignite debates on the balance between constitutional rights and public safety concerns.